Opportunity Information: Apply for 7200AA24RFI00004
USAID is inviting input through a Request for Information (RFI) focused on how unmanned aerial systems (UAS), including drones and related technologies, are being used in humanitarian assistance, stabilization, and broader development work. This notice is not a grant competition and does not offer funding; it is a market and knowledge scan intended to help USAID understand what is already working, what risks exist, and what standards and safeguards should be built into future programming. The RFI is issued by USAID's Bureau for Conflict Prevention and Stabilization (CPS) under reference number 7200AA24RFI00004. It was released on January 17, 2024, and responses were due by February 14, 2024 at 11:00 AM Eastern Time. Submissions were to be emailed to Apisit Viriya (aviriya@usaid.gov) and Daniel Ramirez (dramirez@usaid.gov). Eligible respondents are unrestricted, meaning individuals, nonprofits, companies, academic groups, and other organizations could respond.
The main purpose is to gather practical, experience-based information on how UAS can support operations in hard-to-reach, insecure, or infrastructure-poor environments, and to understand both benefits and downsides. USAID notes that drone use in aid and development is expanding in ways similar to other sectors, with examples such as infrastructure monitoring (like electrical lines) and medical or lifesaving supply delivery. At the same time, the agency points to modern conflict contexts, including Ukraine, to highlight that drone technology can be repurposed or adapted for harmful uses, which raises concerns that responsible actors must anticipate. USAID is therefore trying to learn from implementers about real-world lessons, ethical challenges, technical constraints, and mitigation measures so future activities can embed appropriate procedures, ethical guidelines, and risk management from the start. Another goal is to identify organizations already doing innovative work with UAS that could inform or support future USAID approaches.
The RFI lays out a set of questions to guide responses, but respondents were allowed to answer any subset and add other relevant insights. USAID is asking about organizational policies and governance around UAS use, including what internal guidelines exist and how decisions are made about when and how drones are deployed. It asks whether respondents are currently using UAS in development, stabilization, or humanitarian programs, what the use cases are (for example, mapping, assessment, logistics, monitoring, or other applications), and in which regions those activities occur. USAID also wants to know whether any described work was conducted on behalf of USAID or another U.S. government agency, and it specifically requests that respondents clarify this if they discuss particular projects.
A major theme is lessons learned, including community acceptance and the social risks around perception of surveillance. USAID explicitly asks whether organizations have faced local concerns about data collection or surveillance and what steps were taken to manage those concerns. This points to interest in community engagement practices, transparency, complaint mechanisms, consent processes, and practical ways implementers communicate what data is collected, why it is collected, who can access it, and how it will be protected. Related to operating in foreign countries, USAID asks what permissions or authorizations were required before or during UAS operations. This includes regulatory approvals, aviation permissions, coordination with local authorities, and any steps needed to comply with national laws and local norms.
Capacity building is another core interest. The RFI asks whether respondents provided training or technical assistance so local users could set up, operate, and maintain UAS, how that training was structured, and how long it lasted. USAID is looking for what worked and what did not, including sustainability issues such as maintenance, replacement parts, skills retention, safe operating procedures, and whether the program created lasting local capability or depended heavily on external expertise. It also asks for considerations around consent and establishing clear parameters for use, which signals attention to governance and safeguards that prevent mission creep, misuse, or community harm.
On the technical side, USAID requests details on the types of UAS being used, such as size, range, ground control mechanisms, brand, and any other specifications that affect suitability in field environments. It also asks whether organizations track where drones are manufactured and where components are sourced, and whether supply chain provenance is important. This is likely tied to considerations like reliability, security, compliance requirements, geopolitical and procurement constraints, and long-term supportability in fragile contexts.
Cost and effectiveness are treated as practical decision factors rather than assumptions. USAID asks what makes UAS cost-effective, or not, in humanitarian and development settings. This invites respondents to address total cost of ownership, staffing, training, insurance, licensing, maintenance, battery logistics, spare parts, data processing, and the comparison to alternative approaches such as ground surveys, satellite imagery, manned aircraft, or community-based monitoring. USAID also asks how organizations measure UAS effectiveness, which can include operational metrics (time saved, coverage area, delivery reliability), programmatic metrics (improved targeting of aid, better infrastructure maintenance), and protection metrics (reduced staff exposure to hazardous areas).
Security and harm prevention are emphasized heavily. USAID asks how organizations secure UAS against hacking of control systems or interception of the data stream and how important cybersecurity protections are in practice. Beyond cyber risks, USAID asks what other vulnerabilities drones introduce, which can include physical capture, jamming, spoofing, accidental crashes, safety risks to bystanders, or escalation risks in conflict-affected settings where drones may be misinterpreted. USAID also raises an explicit equity and do-no-harm concern: how to ensure UAS are not used in ways that exacerbate inequity or harm marginalized communities. This invites discussion of bias in data collection, uneven surveillance burdens, privacy risks, differential access to benefits, and safeguards that prevent drones from becoming tools that intimidate or exclude.
Finally, USAID requests information about the broader ecosystem of innovation, asking whether respondents know of leading organizations innovating in UAS for development and humanitarian assistance and inviting respondents to describe their own strengths if they consider themselves leaders in this space. In terms of what happens after submissions, USAID states it may, depending on the volume and content of responses and other constraints like funding availability, hold a virtual industry day for information sharing and/or conduct one-on-one follow-up discussions with some or all respondents. USAID also reserves the right to change the process and notes that there may be no follow-up at all.
The RFI includes standard government disclaimers that matter for planning and expectations. Responding is voluntary, USAID will not reimburse any costs for preparing a response, and the RFI does not constitute a Request for Proposals (RFP), Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), or Request for Applications (RFA). It does not commit USAID to issue a future solicitation or make an award. USAID also explains that information submitted becomes government property, and respondents must clearly mark any information they do not want shared; otherwise USAID will assume there is no objection to sharing the submission within other U.S. government offices or programs. Overall, the opportunity is best understood as USAID seeking candid, field-tested input to shape safer, more ethical, and more effective future use of drones in humanitarian, stabilization, and development contexts, while identifying capable partners and common pitfalls before scaling UAS-related activities.Apply for 7200AA24RFI00004
- The Agency for International Development in the other sector is offering a public funding opportunity titled "Request for Information (RFI) Utilization of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) in humanitarian assistance and development" and is now available to receive applicants.
- Interested and eligible applicants and submit their applications by referencing the CFDA number(s): 98.001.
- This funding opportunity was created on 2024-01-17.
- Applicants must submit their applications by 2024-02-14. (Agency may still review applications by suitable applicants for the remaining/unused allocated funding in 2026.)
- Eligible applicants include: Unrestricted.
[Watch] Creating a grant proposal using the step-by-step wizard inside the applicant portal:
FAQs: USAID RFI on Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) for Humanitarian Assistance, Stabilization, and Development
1) What is this USAID opportunity?
This is a Request for Information (RFI) issued by USAID to collect practical input on how unmanned aerial systems (UAS), including drones and related technologies, are being used in humanitarian assistance, stabilization, and broader development work.
2) Is this a grant competition or a funding opportunity?
No. USAID states this notice is not a grant competition and does not offer funding. It is a market and knowledge scan to inform future thinking and potential programming.
3) What is the reference number for this RFI?
The reference number is 7200AA24RFI00004.
4) Which USAID office issued the RFI?
The RFI was issued by USAID's Bureau for Conflict Prevention and Stabilization (CPS).
5) When was the RFI released and when were responses due?
The RFI was released on January 17, 2024. Responses were due by February 14, 2024 at 11:00 AM Eastern Time.
6) How were responses supposed to be submitted?
Submissions were to be emailed to the points of contact listed in the RFI.
7) Who were the points of contact for submissions?
Responses were to be emailed to Apisit Viriya (aviriya@usaid.gov) and Daniel Ramirez (dramirez@usaid.gov).
8) Who was eligible to respond to this RFI?
Eligibility was unrestricted. Individuals, nonprofits, companies, academic groups, and other organizations could respond.
9) What is USAID trying to learn through this RFI?
USAID is trying to understand what is already working with UAS in real-world humanitarian, stabilization, and development contexts; what risks exist (technical, ethical, security, and social); and what standards, safeguards, and risk management measures should be built into future programming from the start.
10) What kinds of environments or operating conditions are emphasized?
The RFI focuses on how UAS can support operations in hard-to-reach, insecure, or infrastructure-poor environments.
11) What are examples of UAS use cases mentioned or implied in the RFI?
USAID references or invites input on use cases such as mapping, assessment, logistics (including medical or lifesaving delivery), monitoring, and infrastructure monitoring (for example, electrical lines), along with other applications respondents may propose.
12) Why does USAID emphasize risk and harm prevention so strongly?
USAID notes that modern conflict contexts show how drone technology can be repurposed or adapted for harmful uses. The RFI seeks lessons and mitigation measures so future activities can include appropriate procedures, ethical guidelines, and safeguards.
13) Do respondents have to answer every question in the RFI?
No. The RFI provides guiding questions, but respondents were allowed to answer any subset and add other relevant insights.
14) What does USAID ask about organizational governance and policies?
USAID asks about internal policies and governance around UAS use, including what guidelines exist and how decisions are made about when and how drones are deployed.
15) Does USAID want to know where UAS activities are happening?
Yes. USAID asks where UAS activities occur, including regions in which the work is being conducted.
16) Does USAID ask whether UAS work was done for USAID or other U.S. government agencies?
Yes. If respondents describe particular projects, USAID asks them to clarify whether the work was conducted on behalf of USAID or another U.S. government agency.
17) What community acceptance issues is USAID concerned about?
USAID highlights social risks around community perceptions of surveillance and asks whether organizations have faced local concerns about data collection or surveillance, and what steps were taken to address those concerns.
18) What kinds of community engagement or transparency practices does the RFI point toward?
Based on the questions asked, USAID is interested in how implementers communicate what data is collected, why it is collected, who can access it, and how it will be protected, as well as practices such as transparency, complaint mechanisms, and consent processes.
19) Does the RFI address permissions and legal/regulatory requirements in host countries?
Yes. USAID asks what permissions or authorizations were required before or during UAS operations, including regulatory approvals, aviation permissions, coordination with local authorities, and compliance with national laws and local norms.
20) What does USAID ask about capacity building and training?
USAID asks whether respondents provided training or technical assistance for local users to set up, operate, and maintain UAS, how training was structured, and how long it lasted.
21) What sustainability issues does USAID want respondents to address?
USAID is interested in what worked and what did not regarding sustainability, including maintenance, replacement parts, skills retention, safe operating procedures, and whether a program built lasting local capability or relied heavily on external expertise.
22) Does USAID ask about consent and boundaries on use?
Yes. The RFI asks for considerations around consent and establishing clear parameters for use, reflecting concerns about governance, safeguards, and preventing misuse or mission creep.
23) What technical details does USAID request about the drones/UAS being used?
USAID requests details such as size, range, ground control mechanisms, brand, and other specifications that affect suitability in field environments.
24) Does the RFI ask about manufacturing origin and supply chain provenance?
Yes. USAID asks whether organizations track where drones are manufactured and where components are sourced, and whether supply chain provenance is important.
25) Why might supply chain provenance matter in this context?
The RFI links this topic to considerations such as reliability, security, compliance requirements, geopolitical and procurement constraints, and long-term supportability in fragile contexts.
26) How does USAID approach cost and cost-effectiveness in the RFI?
USAID treats cost and effectiveness as practical factors to be examined. It asks what makes UAS cost-effective (or not) in humanitarian and development settings.
27) What types of costs does USAID expect respondents to consider?
The RFI invites discussion of total cost of ownership, including staffing, training, insurance, licensing, maintenance, battery logistics, spare parts, and data processing.
28) Does USAID want comparisons to alternatives to drones?
Yes. USAID invites comparisons to alternative approaches such as ground surveys, satellite imagery, manned aircraft, or community-based monitoring.
29) How does USAID ask organizations to measure UAS effectiveness?
USAID asks how effectiveness is measured, which can include operational metrics (time saved, coverage area, delivery reliability), programmatic metrics (improved targeting of aid, better infrastructure maintenance), and protection metrics (reduced staff exposure to hazardous areas).
30) What cybersecurity concerns does USAID raise?
USAID asks how organizations secure UAS against hacking of control systems or interception of the data stream and how important cybersecurity protections are in practice.
31) What non-cyber vulnerabilities does USAID flag for UAS operations?
USAID asks what other vulnerabilities drones introduce, which can include physical capture, jamming, spoofing, accidental crashes, safety risks to bystanders, and escalation risks in conflict-affected settings where drones may be misinterpreted.
32) What equity and "do no harm" issues does USAID want addressed?
USAID explicitly asks how to ensure UAS are not used in ways that exacerbate inequity or harm marginalized communities, inviting discussion of bias in data collection, uneven surveillance burdens, privacy risks, unequal access to benefits, and safeguards to prevent intimidation or exclusion.
33) Is USAID using this RFI to identify potential partners or innovators?
Yes. A stated goal is to identify organizations doing innovative work with UAS that could inform or support future USAID approaches, and USAID asks respondents to identify leading organizations and/or describe their own strengths.
34) What might happen after USAID reviews responses?
USAID states it may hold a virtual industry day for information sharing and/or conduct one-on-one follow-up discussions with some or all respondents, depending on the volume and content of responses and other constraints such as funding availability. USAID also notes there may be no follow-up.
35) Does responding to the RFI create any obligation for USAID to issue a future solicitation or make an award?
No. USAID states the RFI does not constitute an RFP, NOFO, or RFA, and it does not commit USAID to issue a future solicitation or make an award.
36) Will USAID reimburse the cost of preparing an RFI response?
No. USAID states it will not reimburse costs incurred in preparing a response, and responding is voluntary.
37) What happens to the information submitted in an RFI response?
USAID states that information submitted becomes government property. Respondents must clearly mark any information they do not want shared; otherwise, USAID will assume there is no objection to sharing the submission within other U.S. government offices or programs.
38) If an organization wants some information kept from being shared, what should they do?
Based on the RFI disclaimer, they should clearly mark any information they do not want shared; otherwise USAID may share it within other U.S. government offices or programs.
39) What is the overall takeaway for organizations reading this notice?
This notice is best understood as USAID seeking candid, field-tested input to shape safer, more ethical, and more effective future use of drones in humanitarian, stabilization, and development contexts, while learning about common pitfalls and identifying capable organizations operating in this space.
Browse more opportunities from the same category: Other
Next opportunity: Colombian National Police wounded and disabled officers – Assistance Project for Social Inclusion Strengthening
Previous opportunity: Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for the Department's Fiscal Year 2023 Comprehensive Housing Counseling Grant Program
Applicant Portal:
Are you interested in learning about about how to apply for this government funding opportunity? You can create a free applicant account and receive instant access to our applicant portal that many business owners like you have benefited from.
Apply for 7200AA24RFI00004
Applicants also applied for:
Applicants who have applied for this opportunity (7200AA24RFI00004) also looked into and applied for these:
| Funding Opportunity |
|---|
| Public Diplomacy Small Grants Program 2024 Apply for PAS 800 FY24 02 Funding Number: PAS 800 FY24 02 Agency: U.S. Mission to North Macedonia Category: Other Funding Amount: $20,000 |
| Implementation and Logistic support of a Police Athletic League in Guatemala Apply for OFOP0001281 Funding Number: OFOP0001281 Agency: Bureau of International Narcotics-Law Enforcement Category: Other Funding Amount: $200,000 |
| DRL FY23 Burma Programs - Statements of Interest Apply for SFOP0010194 Funding Number: SFOP0010194 Agency: Bureau of Democracy Human Rights and Labor Category: Other Funding Amount: $1,726,689 |
| Promoting a Better Understanding of the United States through American Studies Apply for DOS LONDON PD 2024 02 Funding Number: DOS LONDON PD 2024 02 Agency: U.S. Mission to the United Kingdom Category: Other Funding Amount: $200,000 |
| FY 2024 Study of the U.S. Institutes for Student Leaders from the Western Hemisphere Apply for SFOP0010201 Funding Number: SFOP0010201 Agency: Bureau Of Educational and Cultural Affairs Category: Other Funding Amount: $1,600,000 |
| U.S. Embassy Luanda Public Diplomacy Section Request for Statements of Interest: Annual Program Statement Apply for DOS PAS ANG FY24 01 Funding Number: DOS PAS ANG FY24 01 Agency: U.S. Mission to Angola Category: Other Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| DRL Scholar Rescue Fund Apply for SFOP0010197 Funding Number: SFOP0010197 Agency: Bureau of Democracy Human Rights and Labor Category: Other Funding Amount: $5,500,000 |
| WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM Apply for BH 004 FY2024 Funding Number: BH 004 FY2024 Agency: U.S. Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina Category: Other Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| DEMOCRACY COMMISSION SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM Apply for BH 003 FY2024 Funding Number: BH 003 FY2024 Agency: U.S. Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina Category: Other Funding Amount: $50,000 |
| U.S. Embassy Brazzaville PDS Annual Program Statement Apply for PDS BRAZZAVILLE FY24 03 Funding Number: PDS BRAZZAVILLE FY24 03 Agency: U.S. Mission to the Republic of the Congo Category: Other Funding Amount: $20,000 |
| Fiscal Year 2023 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Apply for DHS 23 GPD 044 00 98 Funding Number: DHS 23 GPD 044 00 98 Agency: Department of Homeland Security - FEMA Category: Other Funding Amount: $9,000,000 |
| Julia Taft Refugee Notice of Funding Opportunity, POL/ECON, U.S. Embassy Yaounde Apply for AFYDE JTF GR POLECON 2024 Funding Number: AFYDE JTF GR POLECON 2024 Agency: U.S. Mission to Cameroon Category: Other Funding Amount: $25,000 |
| Staff Sergeant Fox Suicide Prevention Grant Program Apply for VA FOX SP FY2024 Funding Number: VA FOX SP FY2024 Agency: Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Category: Other Funding Amount: $750,000 |
| Increasing Awareness of the U.S.-Pakistan Partnership Through Reporting Tours Apply for SCAISB 24 AW 003 01282024 Funding Number: SCAISB 24 AW 003 01282024 Agency: U.S. Mission to Pakistan Category: Other Funding Amount: $250,000 |
| U.S. Embassy Paraguay - PD Annual Program Statement Fiscal Year 2024 Apply for OFOP0001266 Funding Number: OFOP0001266 Agency: U.S. Mission to Paraguay Category: Other Funding Amount: $20,000 |
| Climate Change Reporting Apply for SCAISB 24 AW 002 01282024 Funding Number: SCAISB 24 AW 002 01282024 Agency: U.S. Mission to Pakistan Category: Other Funding Amount: $400,000 |
| Bridging Basketball with English Language Learning and U.S. Education Opportunities Apply for SCAISB 24 AW 001 01282024 Funding Number: SCAISB 24 AW 001 01282024 Agency: U.S. Mission to Pakistan Category: Other Funding Amount: $100,000 |
| Certificate or Training Program in Mediation and Conflict Resolution Apply for UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP FY24 ARM 7 Funding Number: UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP FY24 ARM 7 Agency: U.S. Mission to Armenia Category: Other Funding Amount: $200,000 |
| Fiscal Year 2024 Targeted Violence and Terrorism Prevention Grant Program Apply for DHS 24 TTP 132 00 99 Funding Number: DHS 24 TTP 132 00 99 Agency: Department of Homeland Security - FEMA Category: Other Funding Amount: $1,500,000 |
| 24.PMWRA.SouthSudan.HMA.NOFO Apply for SFOP0010217 Funding Number: SFOP0010217 Agency: Bureau of Political-Military Affairs - WRA Category: Other Funding Amount: $2,000,000 |
Grant application guides and resources
It is always free to apply for government grants. However the process may be very complex depending on the funding opportunity you are applying for. Let us help you!
Apply for Grants
Inside Our Applicants Portal
Access Applicants Portal
- Grants Repository - Access current and historic funding opportunities with ease. Thousands of funding opportunities are published every week. We can help you sort through the database and find the eligible ones to apply for.
- Applicant Video Guides - The grant application process can be challenging to follow. We can help you with intuitive video guides to speed up the process and eliminate errors in submissions.
- Grant Proposal Wizard - We have developed a network of private funding organizations and investors across the United States. We can reach out and submit your proposal to these contacts to maximize your chances of getting the funding you need.
Premium leads for funding administrators, grant writers, and loan issuers
Thousands of people visit our website for their funding needs every day. When a user creates a grant proposal and files for submission, we pass the information on to funding administrators, grant writers, and government loan issuers.
If you manage government grant programs, provide grant writing services, or issue personal or government loans, we can help you reach your audience.
Learn More
Request more information:
Would you like to learn more about this funding opportunity, similar opportunities to "7200AA24RFI00004", eligibility, application service, and/or application tips? Submit an inquiry below:
Don't forget to subscribe to our grant alerts mailing list to receive weekly alerts on new and updated grant funding opportunities like this one in your email.